User Options

A Membership is required. Please Login or Create an account to get startedRequest us to build a Downloadable Document Product on this TopicMake a Request for GMI to add more Articles on this Topic Immediately (Purchase Required)View a Printer Friendly version of this pageE-mail this page to a friendPerform a Search with this Topic
Hover over an icon for more information

Additional Topics Details for this Page

  • - 4
  • - 70

View the Evidence: Problematic Actions

Pubmed Data : Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Dec;42(12):818-21. PMID: 18476514
Study Type : Meta Analysis

Pubmed Data : Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;201(3):273.e1-9. PMID: 19733277
Study Type : Meta Analysis

Pubmed Data : Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Jun;43(6):401-4. PMID: 19035130
Study Type : Meta Analysis

Pubmed Data : Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Mar 5. Epub 2012 Mar 5. PMID: 22384940
Study Type : Human Study



Related Blogs

Written by Sayer Ji, Founder
A new study linking birth induction to autism is rippling through the mainstream press, but something vitally important is being lost in the translation; namely, the need to return to natural, ancient birth practices, whenever possible.
Written by Judy Cohain, CNM
45% of births in the US are now induced, but evidence supporting this intervention is severely lacking. Case controlled studies show no benefit to inducing for postdates. Routinely inducing for postdates is based on 3 uncontrolled, retrospective studies showing 1/1000 less stillbirths while ignoring possible increases in brain damage to newborns as a result of induction.
Written by Judy Cohain, CNM
Today research wrongly considers hospital birth as the gold standard. Bias towards hospital births causes the majority of researchers to ignore the fact that women could achieve even better outcomes than hospital birth, at planned attended homebirth.

Print Options