Big Tobacco Court-Ordered To Tell Only Half The Truth

Big Tobacco Court Ordered To Tell Only Half The Truth

This week, a U.S. judge ordered tobacco companies to publicly admit they lied about the dangers of smoking, but they are still being allowed to cover up the lethal, radiation-linked health risks associated with tobacco use.

With the latest court order by a U.S. judge to force tobacco firms to admit they lied about the dangers of smoking making headlines, it is easy to forget that big tobacco did not only lie, but knowingly allowed (and are still allowing) millions of smokers to suffer and die from radioisotope-contaminated tobacco poisoning with their full knowledge and consent.

According to a 2009 article in the journal Isis, both external and industry scientists started researching the dangers of radioisotopes in cigarettes over 40 years ago. The first scientific paper on polonium-210, a daughter radioisotope of uranium, linking it to lung cancer was published in 1964. According to the article:

Despite forty years of research suggesting that polonium is a leading carcinogen in tobacco, the manufacturers have not made a definitive move to reduce the concentration of radioactive isotopes in cigarettes. The polonium story therefore presents yet another chapter in the long tradition of industry use of science and scientific authority in an effort to thwart disease prevention. The impressive extent to which tobacco manufacturers understood the hazards of polonium and the high executive level at which the problem and potential solutions were discussed within the industry are exposed here by means of internal documents made available through litigation. [i]

The internal documents referenced above, which were made available online in 1998 by the Master Settlement Agreement, revealed that the companies suppressed publication of their own internal research to avoid heightening the public's awareness of radioactivity in cigarettes.[ii]

Polonium-210: The #1 Health Threat In Tobacco

Polonium-210 is a byproduct of the decay of uranium daughter isotopes, which, while occurring naturally in the environment, are primarily found within our soil as a result of the use of phosphate fertilizers and pollution from various industries. Industry sources include uranium mining, nuclear and coal-fired power plants. In fact, "fly ash" produced from coal-fired power carries 100 times more radiation into the surrounding environment than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy. This is, of course, when nuclear power plants properly contain their radioactive fuel and waste and don't release massive, irretrievable quantities of radioisotopes into the environment, as occurred in Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Nuclear weapons and munitions (depleted uranium), are another well-known source of global contamination. Also, for those who believe certified organic tobacco is safer, no matter where the uranium comes from, tobacco plants selectively absorb and concentrate the byproduct of its decay, Polonium-210, to dangerous -- if not lethal -- levels. The relatively high levels found within tobacco are rather consistent over time and geographical area.[iii]

Lung Cancer Tobacco Polonium 210

A recent review published in the journal Nicotine & Tobacco Research summarized this disturbing fact of history as follows:

[T]he industry was not only cognizant of the potential "cancerous growth" in the lungs of regular smokers but also did quantitative radiobiological calculations to estimate the long-term (25 years) lung radiation absorption dose (rad) of ionizing alpha particles emitted from the cigarette smoke. Our own calculations of lung rad of alpha particles match closely the rad estimated by the industry. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the industry's and our estimate of long-term lung rad of alpha particles causes 120-138 lung cancer deaths per year per 1,000 regular smokers.

Continue to Page 2

Pages :
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Polonium-210 in fruits and vegetables?



Hi Sayer - the article says that Polonium-210 occurs naturally in soil and that tobacco companies don't take steps to mitigate the risk in tobacco. Is Polonium-210 in all soil and thus is this found in fruits and vegetables too?

Smoking Gun



Phosphate mines dot Florida where gypsum wastes are deemed too radioactive even for use in roadbeds. These are the same folks that scrub fluroillicic acid from their superphosphate production stacks (used to medicate water supplies) because if released would kill the cattle for miles around. Cancer rates are huge near these mines and among workers, yet this multi-billion dollar industry gets a free pass from state regulators. The same superphosphates are used in all commercial agriculture. Additives and bio-accumulated metals like cadmium are other dangers. Smoking does not have to be as deadly as it is and I urge smokers to switch to organic tobacco and help protect themselves with a large intake of antioxidants.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to write a comment