Why An Alkaline Approach Can Successfully Treat Cancer

Nancy is the founder of The Cancer Alternative Foundation

Why An Alkaline Approach Can Successfully Treat Cancer

In the 1930's, an interesting natural cancer treatment was proposed as a simple, effective answer to cancer – almost any cancer.  This treatment approach is not well known because it is considered alternative or experimental - or even dangerous[i] - by the medical and scientific community and hence has been referenced primarily in obscure publications outside the mainstream press.

This treatment approach is called alkaline therapy or pH therapy, and is based in part on observations of cultures without significant incidence of cancer[ii] and in part on scientific observations of and experimentation with cellular metabolism.[iii]

The principles of pH therapy are very simple.  The metabolism of cancer cells has a very narrow pH tolerance for cellular proliferation (mitosis), which is between 6.5 and 7.5.  As such, if you can interfere with cancer cell metabolism by either lowering or raising the internal cancer cell pH, you can theoretically stop cancer progression.[iv]  

While lowering cancer cell pH (increasing acidity) is effective against cancer cell mitosis in the lab, increasing acid levels in the live body of a cancer patient puts stress on normal cells and causes a lot of pain.  So the proposed alkaline therapy for people is a "high pH therapy" and has been developed to normalize the intracellular pH of the cancer patient's body through elimination of latent acidosis, while increasing the pH of cancer cells to a range above 7.5.  According to published research, it is at that pH they revert to a normal cellular apoptosis cycle (programed cell death).[v]

Ideally, this approach begins with an alkaline diet.  There is general agreement amongst natural healers and medical professionals alike, that changing a cancer patient's diet is extremely helpful when someone is confronted with a cancer diagnosis.  In a previous article, I outlined the six steps that every cancer patient should take to provide the best chance to heal from and prevent future recurrences of cancer using alkaline diet principles.[vi]

The alkaline diet, which is primarily plant-based and avoids sugar, dairy, wheat and other high-gluten grains as well as an excess consumption of fruits, while emphasizing fresh vegetables and vegetable juices along with cruciferous vegetables and greens, changes the body's intracellular pH to come close to the ideal blood pH of 7.3/7.41  - a key metabolic accomplishment on the path to longevity whether you have cancer or not!  An alkaline diet based on vegetables and fruits creates a less-than-optimal environment for cancer proliferation, while at the same time strengthens the immune function and supports healthy cells in the body through improved nutrition.

The second step is to use some nutritional mechanism to move the internal cancer cell pH from the optimal mitosis range of pH 6.5 to 7.5, to above 8, which shortens the life of the cancer cell.  As described by its proponents, alkaline therapy neutralizes the acid waste of the cancer which causes so much pain, interferes with the anaerobic fermentation of glucose that starts the self-feeding acidic cancer wasting cycle called cachexia and in time, can induce remission.  If this theory of alkaline therapy holds true, it should be possible to address cancer without chemotherapy, radiation or surgery and use alkaline therapy as a primary cancer treatment.

This bold statement comes from a somewhat abstruse body of research.  In the 1880's, Louis Pasteur published his work on cellular aerobic respiration and glycolysis.  In 1931, Otto Warburg won the Nobel Prize for his work on the metabolism of tumors and the respiration of cells, which was later summarized in his 1956 paper, On the Origin of Cancer Cells.  His work on cancer expanded upon Pasteur's findings and described respiratory insufficiency and a cellular metabolism of glucose fermentation as the primary trigger for cancer progression[vii].

Warburg's conclusions on cancer were much discussed in scientific circles, as they are academically elegant, but were not accepted by most members of the scientific community engaged in cancer research.  Most cancer researchers in the late 1950's believed that the anaerobic metabolism of cancer cells and their accompanying output of lactic acid was a side effect or an adjunct effect of cancer, not a cause.  Cancer research since the 1960's has focused primarily on genetic aberrations as causative for cancer, and has ignored the body of research on cancer pH and its implications for therapeutic approaches.[viii]

Warburg's work was a catalyst for yet another research effort on the nature of cancer cells, beginning in the 1930's.  A. Keith Brewer, PhD (physicist) performed experiments on the relationship between energized, oxygenated cell membrane and elemental uptake, vs. cellular membranes in an unenergized state such as cancer cells exhibit.  He wrote a number of papers discussing the cellular mechanisms of cancer cells and the changes in metabolism induced or indicated by the lack of or presence of oxygen in combination with other elements, particularly potassium and calcium.   He noted that cancer cells share one characteristic no matter what type of cancer:  they have lost their pH control mechanism.

Brewer's summary conclusion regarding cancer was that by changing the pH of cancer cells to alkaline (above 7.5), they will cease to function as they need an acidic, anaerobic environment to thrive.  In other words, he proposed that cancer cells will die if they can be pushed into an alkaline, oxygenated state.[ix]

Brewer's work cites areas in the world where cancer incidents are very low.  These areas contain concentrations of alkalizing minerals in the soil and water, which are greater than in other parts of the world.  For example, the Hunza of northern Pakistan and the Hopi Indians of the American West share both similar soil and water conditions and diet.  The alkaline elemental minerals of cesium chloride, germanium and rubidium are heavily present in the soil and water.  Ingestion of these elements is correspondingly high.  These peoples also live in similar high, dry climates and grow apricot orchards, traditionally eating the fresh or dried fruit and the seeds each day. 

It should be noted that apricot seeds are the source of the controversial cancer treatment Laetrile or B-17/Amygdalin.[x]   Apricot seeds contain trace amounts of cyanide, which has long been identified as a potential chemotherapeutic agent against cancer proliferation.[xi]   Other similarities in the diet include a low consumption of dairy products, meat and wheat, as these foodstuffs are difficult to farm in high, arid climates and a correspondingly greater consumption of millet, buckwheat, nuts, dried fruits and berries in their traditional diets, all of which contain a similar enhanced (though sill minute) concentration of cyanide.

This is all very interesting, but what does it really mean for cancer patients who wish to avoid the pain of cancer and the typical course of treatment using surgery, chemotherapy and radiation?  What are the conditions that will force cancer cells to change their pH?

Conventional chemotherapeutic agents such as Cytoxan usually cause more damage to normal cells than to cancer cells, because cancer cells have a very thick, unenergized cellular membrane that essentially protects them from absorbing many drugs.  Normal cells have no such protection. 

Conversely, cancer cells have no way to normalize their internal pH, where normal cells are relatively unaffected by high concentrations of alkalizing minerals.  However cancer cells take up primarily two elements:  glucose and potassium.

In practical application, then, it is necessary to find a way to guide alkalizing elements - such as cesium, germanium or rubidium - into cancer cells, without impacting normal cells.  It turns out this can be done using a transport agent that penetrates the bone/blood barriers, then relying on the normal uptake of alkalizing elements that follow the potassium pathway.  Cancer cells appear to have preferential uptake of cesium chloride in particular, but also take up germanium, rubidium, selenium, etc. all through the potassium pathway.

There is a compound that is frequently applied to the skin by arthritis sufferers for relief of inflammation, used in brain surgery to relieve intracranial pressure and topically used in sports medicine and veterinary medicine,[xii] also for reducing inflammation.  This compound is called DMSO and it is formed in the slurry created from soaking wood chips in water that is a bi-product of the paper making industry. 

Folklore has it that workers in the paper making industry were observed to have their hands in water continuously, but they never developed arthritis and had rapidly healing skin and strong nails.  Experimentation with DMSO as a medical treatment began in the 1800's and continues to the present day.  DMSO is medically approved in the United States only for the treatment of interstitial cystitis, a type of inflammation of the bladder.[xiii]

Continue to Page 2

Pages :
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

alkaline diet

This is just wrong, although alkaline is the way to kill cancer. Avoiding fruit is ridiculous. It has more nutrients for fighting cancer than veggies do. I won't go into all the other mis-notions in this article. It was poorly concieved.

Why Restrict Fruit Consumption with cancer

It has been observed that fructose, more than any other form of sugar, can increase speed of cancer mitosis up to a factor of two.  The nutritional properties of fruits are undeniable, but with cancer, restricting sugars to slow mitosis is more important.  

Please refer to the article in pub med that was published after Steve Jobs, a fruitarian and proud of it, died of pancreatic cancer.  There was some thought that his fruit-sugar laced diet may have been one of the factors in his cancer as pancreatic cancer specifically is sensitive to fructose.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647326 

Perhaps you didn't read to the end of the article because the fruit recommendation pushed a button?  You might try again as the research is very compelling.  Note that from the very best clinics in the world and from my personal research, the full recommendations regarding diet for cancer are extremely specific and go on for pages, not a summary paragraph as in this article.  It is therefore difficult for someone doing a quick read of this article to evaluate the validity of dietary recommendations for cancer without understanding them in context, in full.

Very Nice!

The concept of pH is poorly understood and is a great marker for overall body charge since ORP, oxidation-reduction potential, closely tracks pH.  Body charge or potential measures the very electrochemical energy of life which determines all biochemistry, all states of health (not just cancer) and oxygen survivability.  Alkaline states reflect body charge to put it simply.

ph, body charge and oxygen delivery are fundamental to life...Kudos!

More work to do!

Thank you for your well informed comment, which brings up a critical point regarding alkalinity and body health - fundamental electromagnetic communication at a cellular level, which is dependent on favorable intracellular pH.  The discussion of alkaline/acid balance in the diet is much distorted by those who do not really understand the negative impact of acidic conditions at a cellular and microbiological level.  Since excess acid in intracellular fluids is the most significant cause of inflammation, and inflammation is at the root of most chronic disease, this subject needs expansion and clarification in the eyes of the public.   


Hi Nancy, To get a handle on this, one needs to reacquaint with simple acid-base oxidation-reduction chemistry.  There are acid forming and alkalizing foods where one seeks balance, not total avoidance.  Underlying body pH and charge are breathing, kidney function, mineral levels and metal loads as well as the quality of fats composing membranes and of course emotional states. I have archived over a dozen articles on this theme.  pH and charge are fundamental. They determine oxygen delivery, biological energy, blood viscosity, susceptibility to pathogens and influence all biochemistry and DNA expression. Every aspect of life converges here and contributes to a healthy or unhealthy dynamic electron balance.


   Don't overthink this, just take a wiki-tour of basic chemistry and know for sure...and control your balance toward the alkaline well charged side of this foundational bottom-line equation.  This will organize your thinking and you'll find you already know most of it.

Hope readers pick up on your great advice

My experience with cancer patients and with those suffering from other chronic disease is that they don't really know that much about their personal body chemistry.  Teaching them how to apply alkaline therapy, particularly the mineral component, is quite challenging.  Most of my clients tend to think in terms of what they can continue to do, not what they have to change to alter their body chemistry and address their condition.

From here on out, I'll be recommending they take the wiki-tour - then we can discuss and they can take the test.  Thank you!

Same Prob

   First, cancer and other diseases scare people and their thinking shuts down.

   Second, I can't even get this redox approach over to professionals and health buffs.


I think the simplest way to get the message across is to explain that life is a balance...and hangs in the balance!  This falls into 3 categories...nutrition, detoxification and emotional states/lifestyle choices...So if you indulge in column B(bad/devours electrons, ex; smoking, sugar) you must compensate from column A (good/raises charge, ex; antioxidants, minerals).  Illness requires an overwhelming boost to reverse the negative conditions that likely took years to develop unnoticeably.  No one is perfect on every count, but as long as the overall balance is maintained....So smoke a cigarette take 500mg Vit C to offset...eat a cupcake at a party, exercise for an hour...When the balance gets way out of kilter, large quantities like mega-C are required to return balance. Nutritional correction, hair metal/mineral analysis and serious supplementation will begin to heal the mind at which point the patient must fearlessly take full responsibility for his health.  So without understanding the basic chemistry of the problem, the average person should be able to follow a column A/B approach if they want relief.

  See what works, I'd like to reconcile this communication problem myself.  Best, Randall

Balance is the key

Agreed on all counts.  My clients want the magic bullet.  When I tell them that it is a building of health, requiring many steps, all coming back into balance, they are tired before they start.  So I tell them what we do is try to get their body back in balance and that will requiring tinkering for awhile, start here, that seems to work.  Goes on for a long time - years actually.

Thanks for the dialog.  Good input.

Magic shotgun protocol

The thing about mega Vit C/baking soda is that you can feel better in a matter of days and begin strengthening tissues and clearing the mind in preparation for proteolytic enzymes and stronger oxidative measures to follow. Then yes, it may take a year or more to gradually detox metals and maintain Mg/K levels. Serious disease requires QUANTITATIVE applications of Vit C/antioxidants/oxidants/minerals along with dumping inflammation via intermittent fasting and green juicing and other corrections. A gradual shift of diet is usually too little too late, when more drastic dosing finds rapid success...and when a person feels their efforts working, they gain the confidence for a longer term complete reversal.

I couldn't find your direct email, I wanted to forward a file.  I'm at forbiddenhealing@gmail.com

Magic shotgun protocol

The thing about mega Vit C/baking soda is that you can feel better in a matter of days and begin strengthening tissues and clearing the mind in preparation for proteolytic enzymes and stronger oxidative measures to follow. Then yes, it may take a year or more to gradually detox metals and maintain Mg/K levels. Serious disease requires QUANTITATIVE applications of Vit C/antioxidants/oxidants/minerals along with dumping inflammation via intermittent fasting and green juicing and other corrections. A gradual shift of diet is usually too little too late, when more drastic dosing finds rapid success...and when a person feels their efforts working, they gain the confidence for a longer term complete reversal.

I wanted to forward a file, your link doesn't work...I'm at forbiddenhealing @gmail.com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or Register to write a comment

Key Research Topics

This website is for information purposes only. By providing the information contained herein we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any type of disease or medical condition. Before beginning any type of natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.

© Copyright 2008-2016 GreenMedInfo.com, Journal Articles copyright of original owners, MeSH copyright NLM.