Member Page View Enabled

You are currently viewing this page as a full fledged member! If you would like all pages to display this detail of information and wish to sign up for a membership, please click here

User Options

Download a PDF Document of this page with up to the first 50 articlesRequest us to build a Downloadable Document Product on this TopicMake a Request for GMI to add more Articles on this Topic Immediately (Purchase Required)View a Printer Friendly version of this pageE-mail this page to a friendPerform a Search with this Topic
Hover over an icon for more information

Additional Topics Details for this Page

  • - 6
  • - 70

View the Evidence:

Pubmed Data : Acad Med. 2011 Aug ;86(8):996-1009. PMID: 21670661
Study Type : Meta Analysis

Pubmed Data : Acad Med. 2005 Feb ;80(2):164-7. PMID: 15671323
Study Type : Human Study

Pubmed Data : Acad Med. 2009 Sep ;84(9):1182-91. PMID: 19707055
Study Type : Human Study

Pubmed Data : J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct ;22(10):1434-8. Epub 2007 Jul 26. PMID: 17653807
Study Type : Human Study

Pubmed Data : JAMA. 2002 Jun 19 ;287(23):3143-6. PMID: 12069680
Study Type : Human Study

Pubmed Data : Acad Med. 2008 Mar ;83(3):244-9. PMID: 18316868
Study Type : Human Study



Related Blogs

Written by Sayer Ji, Founder
A surprisingly consistent body of research exists indicating that conventional medical training actually reduces practitioner empathy. What is worse, the decline in empathy appears even more pronounced at the time that the curriculum shifts towards patient-care activities.

Print Options