Abstract Title:

Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and risk of gastric adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study.

Abstract Source:

Clin Exp Allergy. 2001 Mar;31(3):466-73. PMID: 20007304

Abstract Author(s):

Genevieve Buckland, Antonio Agudo, Leila Luján, Paula Jakszyn, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Domenico Palli, Heiner Boeing, Fátima Carneiro, Vittorio Krogh, Carlotta Sacerdote, Rosario Tumino, Salvatore Panico, Gabriella Nesi, Jonas Manjer, Sara Regnér, Ingegerd Johansson, Roger Stenling, María-José Sanchez, Miren Dorronsoro, Aurelio Barricarte, Carmen Navarro, J Ramón Quirós, Naomi E Allen, Timothy J Key, Sheila Bingham, Rudolf Kaaks, Kim Overvad, Majken Jensen, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Petra H M Peeters, Mattijs E Numans, Marga C Ocké, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Sophie Morois, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Eiliv Lund, Elisabeth Couto, Paolo Boffeta, Mazda Jenab, Elio Riboli, Dora Romaguera, Traci Mouw, Carlos A González


BACKGROUND: The Mediterranean dietary pattern is believed to protect against cancer, although evidence from cohort studies that have examined particular cancer sites is limited. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the association between adherence to a relative Mediterranean diet (rMED) and incident gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. DESIGN: The study included 485,044 subjects (144,577 men) aged 35-70 y from 10 European countries. At recruitment, dietary and lifestyle information was collected. An 18-unit rMED score, incorporating 9 key components of the Mediterranean diet, was used to estimate rMED adherence. The association between rMED and GC with respect to anatomic location (cardia and noncardia) and histologic types (diffuse and intestinal) was investigated. A calibration study in a subsample was used to control for dietary measurement error. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 8.9 y, 449 validated incident GC cases were identified and used in the analysis. After stratification by center and age and adjustment for recognized cancer risk factors, high compared with low rMED adherence was associated with a significant reduction in GC risk (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.94). A 1-unit increase in the rMED score was associated with a decreased risk of GC of 5% (95% CI: 0.91, 0.99). There was no evidence of heterogeneity between different anatomic locations or histologic types. The calibrated results showed similar trends (overall hazard ratio for GC: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.99). CONCLUSION: Greater adherence to an rMED is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of incident GC.

Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links

Print Options

Key Research Topics

Sayer Ji
Founder of GreenMedInfo.com

Subscribe to our informative Newsletter & get Nature's Evidence-Based Pharmacy

Our newsletter serves 500,000 with essential news, research & healthy tips, daily.

Download Now

500+ pages of Natural Medicine Alternatives and Information.

This website is for information purposes only. By providing the information contained herein we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any type of disease or medical condition. Before beginning any type of natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.

© Copyright 2008-2021 GreenMedInfo.com, Journal Articles copyright of original owners, MeSH copyright NLM.