Originally published on JeffereyJaxen.com. Republished with permission from the author.
Clinton has never been one to shy away from big corporate money to serve as the lifeblood of her campaign momentum. Despite Clinton's proclamation that she's proud to call the pharmaceutical industry her enemy, her campaign has led the pack receiving the most pharmaceutical, corporate and individual contributions.
Hillary Clinton has made little attempt to play politics or engage in double speak on the topic of vaccinations. In the world of healthcare, medicine and parenting no other topic symbolizes the hot button nature of health freedom and medical choice vaccination represents. Amidst the bickering of fabricated issues and discussions of little or no importance to the public, the presidential debates have left out a laundry list of vital topics. The US has the developed world’s highest infant mortality rates. The US has epidemic-level rates of autism spectrum disorder over the past decades. And the US maternal mortality rate has more than doubled from 2000 to 2014.
California is fighting back against Senate Bill 277 (SB277) as parents and families who want to retain their health freedom and medical choice have been left with no choices as forced vaccination is now mandatory. Unbeknownst to most of the country, a growing subsection of US people have been beating back continued, unrelenting forced vaccination legislation in many states attempting to mirror SB277. Pharmaceutical company lobbyist continually swarm US politicians in order to secure SB277-like legislation in states to secure a revenue stream on their for-profit, zero-liability vaccine products.
Hillary Clinton has made no attempt to hide the deep roots connecting her to big pharma. In addition, she has made little attempt to deviate from the march towards mandatory vaccination signaling the desire to increase the agenda. One of the first times Clinton inserted herself into the vaccine safety conversation was to capitalize on the media hype generated by Donald Trump, Rand Paul and Ben Carson during their debate in September 2015 on the campaign trail. During the debate, Trump made numerous remarks questioning the safety of vaccines and epidemic autism rates. Trumps comments made the pharmaceutical-funded corporate news media instantly swarm to defend their backers by pandering to vaccine-injury deniers in their reporting. It was then that Clinton took to twitter with this message:
Thanks to the continual Wikileaks releases of internal Clinton campaign emails, the public has a window into the thought process of Clinton and her team away from the polished talking points and spin during the time her Twitter message was crafted.
Clinton has never been one to shy away from big corporate money to serve as the lifeblood of her campaign momentum. Despite Clinton's proclamation that she's proud to call the pharmaceutical industry her enemy, her campaign has led the pack receiving the most pharmaceutical, corporate and individual contributions. In return, the pay-for-play scandals – still being unearthed – run through the State Department and Clinton Foundation have reached historical levels of underhandedness and corruption. In the recent #Podesta16 Wikileaks releases, emails obtained from the Clinton Foundation literally spell out what should be obvious to anyone who has been paying attention up until this point by stating:
Clinton attempted to grandstand on the hot button US autism issue – essentially ignored in politics –by releasing her plan to support children, youth and adults living with autism and their families. Nowhere in Hillary’s plan does it call for autism prevention, eliminating the causes (which are known) or working towards bringing the children and adults back from the condition (which can be done). Looking past the bureaucratic wording and polished rollout, her plan calls for earlier psychiatric screening in order to more thoroughly medicate children with problematic psychotropic drugs. Clinton's plan marches lockstep with the American Psychiatric Association's updated diagnostic criteria laid out in their DSM-5 manual.
The future of forced vaccination in the US will most likely come down to one of two factors, or a combination of both. The first factor will be the next US president’s stance on pharmaceutical company monopolies, their stranglehold on US politics and the desire to investigate the corruption at the Center’s of Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine division. The “X” factor will be the next president’s ability to quickly analyze and neutralize any false epidemic, most likely launched in collaboration with the CDC and World Health Organization, for the purpose of moving the needle towards forced vaccination. Both the Swine Flu and the Zika scares were proven to have been greatly exaggerated to further multiple agendas all with the common thread of increasing vaccination rates.
Expect a sweeping federal version of California's Senate Bill 277-like laws to be implemented in the near future under a Clinton presidency. Much like mandatory GMO labeling, once individual states began passing legislation that threatened to label GMOs which by their very nature would target the profits and bottom lines of agrochemical companies, The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) were fast-tracked to eliminate state's rights in the matter.
To date, virtually no US politician – except Congressman Bill Posey – has dedicated themselves to getting Dr. William Thompson (known as the CDC whistle blower) subpoenaed to testify. Attorneys, Bryan Smith and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. recent attempts to subpoena Dr. Thompson in a Tennessee court case involving a 16 year old boy who claims his autism is caused by vaccine injuries was blocked by CDC director Thomas Frieden.
Continually ignoring and blocking the will of millions of Americans demanding justice be served has created a pressure cooker with no steam valve. In response, the establishment medical community, media and politicians have all rapidly lost their integrity and trust with little hope of ever regaining it in the eyes of this generation. The activation of communities against mandatory vaccination and for health freedom since California's SB277 was implemented has moved mountains proving that regardless of who is president the movement will not be silenced.